CrackPixel Step
-
dont start ww 3 pls
-
@hahayes Almost all online people are legit, maybe apart from cheats like AimAssist and maybe some smart Clicker.
-
@i-hate-hatars na g I'm peaceful af
@natalka so lets say there are 20 people spending time on your server, 1 of them is using this step which is detected easily, 5 has aim assist and genius clickers which are easily detected and about to get banwejaved with their 0.99 timer and 1.001 reach and the other 14 legit players are getting cheated on
honestly sounds fun might switch to crackpixel, thanks for advertisementlol you have over 120 posts of god defending crackpixel and claiming its ac is so opee
-
@hahayes You cannot detect every single clicker since it's just a statistic you can theoretically speaking false. The aim cannot be a statistic because while you aim you basically add your own aim as well, so there's no mathematical equation that would be able to detect actively any aim assist or auto clicker because they are both really hard to detect. The only thing you may actually detect is pitch 0.0, or some really stupid aim's GCD.
To detect clicker - you need a person to click constantly so the samples are full filled and can be compared to the samples to flag. If you don't click constantly, it's almost impossible to flag thus yes, some clickers may bypass bedwars, but will not certainly bypass The Pit. Keep in mind that you will get eventually banned for the clicker, and most stupid clickers such as Drip or OP Clicker, Speed Clicker, etc. is just detected.
Reach - this is a harder theory because you will flag almost every reach hit, depending on the hitbox hit (low reach). It takes time to detect really gentle reach, so below 3.05, it will take a bit of time, although it's not an advantage until 3.1 either way.
Banwaves - Okay, so let's say you use absolutely useless cheats like Step. The step is just useless because it gives you almost no advantage if you don't have a follow-up cheat. The step will get banwaved theoretically. Or using really, really, really gentle speed like 0.01% modification will banwave you, quickly. Really low reach or auto clicker is delaying bans thus banwaving. 0.99 timer is a disadvantage, the lowest timer you can detect without falses is x0.82, but I'm pretty sure you don't know that.
Please, try to make an anticheat first, and then we can talk about it because you said really stupid things here like with the timer.
-
@natalka oh no I'm not that braindead, I'm pretty much quoting your previous posts with a bit of exaggeration
feel free to read your very own posts before replying again
also I'm sure a anticheat genius like you would know but step, specially when it is this simple should be nothing to detect and lag back compared to your insane autoclicker checks
-
@hahayes You are living in 20th century, don't you? Lagbacking nowadays is not recommended.
-
@rafay This isn't even remotely a "war", a anti cheat genius who is a staff on a server is replying to me, a casual cheater
we are just exchanging posts like mature people with no insults
-
@hahayes hmmm.... ok whatever, i ignore people who say they are perfect aka. natalka
-
@hahayes Either way, keep this bypass! It's really insane bro, flyhack.
-
first of all sorry I'm not living in 20th century, I advise you to check the calendar
so that pretty much means you can find a fly that may or may not silent flag and go as much as you want for hours depending on how much you silent flag, sounds about right
well you might as well forget the lagback part
weren't you able to detect insane clickers, so well that it even banned legits
the reason why people use such small amounts of reach is to get the first hit and with a decent autoclicker even something as small as 0.5 can create a difference
also weren't you able to detect 0 timer with opee badpackets check because it is not 2018 anyway, as far as I'm concerned 0 < 0.82, correct me if I'm wrong
it is clear as day that you don't even know what you said in the pastlastly, you don't have to make a anticheat to test anticheats, I'm sure you know that
-
@natalka no, this is pretty much a bypass that can be made in a few minutes maximum which is kind of emberrasing for a anticheat this good
but I guess we all are in the wrong for thinking this is a bypass but we were tricked all along, it actually silent flags and you don't know what cheat banned you!
you got us all good not gonna lie -
@hahayes Aight, show me a fly that won't lag back you or instaban you. Also I said you can detect timer as low as 0.82 and below. You can't read.
-
@natalka why would I spend my very own time trying to find a fly exploit for a server that has like 30 players, that is just a very childish way of responding to all the problems abut your post
let me remind you I have the role of a casual cheater here not a developer trying to argue
by the way you are the one that can't read, I was talking about a post you made in the past and I even said that just a line after it
"the lowest timer you can detect without falses is 0.82, but I'm pretty sure you don't know that."
If you go to your own posts you can see a post responding to a post which about 0 timer claiming you can detect it with badpackets and your anticheat isn't outdated (not made in 2018/19 (!))oh btw just in case you claim you are able to detect it but you don't because it is a insane disadvantage (and not a way to find bypasses) and you don't want to false ban your precious legits I would tell you to read the posts you made in past again
please think before responding
-
@hahayes Okay, you seriously need some English courses, maybe you can try Duolingo, might help you!
-
@natalka I'm sorry for not having such good and advanced english like you but as far as I know "the lowest timer you can detect without falses is 0.82" means you can't detect timer lower than 0.82, correct me if I'm wrong
also you seriously need to fix your time travel machine, you are in the wrong century
-
@hahayes Lowest timer means that you detect 0.82 > (meaning of lower than 0.82) so you can't detect 0.83 without falses, but you certainly can 0.81, 0.80 etc.
-
@natalka
lowest timer you can detect without falses = 0.82
0.81 < 0.82 < 0.830.81 is lower than 0.82 so you can't detect 0.81
0.83 is higher than 0.82 so you can perhaps detect thatthe way of your thinking sounds false to me
the closer you get to 1 the number is bigger
the closer you are to 0 the number is smaller
and as you know 0.83 is closer to 1 than 0.81lowest means as low as you get
so that means and number closer to 0 than 0.82 you can't detect -
@hahayes Either way, I meant that you can't detect 0.99-0.83 but you can 0.82-0.00
