CrossVersion-Support is coming

[1689295608]

@Temm It doesn't matter. I just mentioned it. It's good to support multiple versions, at least not limited to 1.8.9. And what we want is more powerful capabilities~

[Litely]

i hope liquidbounce will have liquid portal like lagma but in 1.8.9

[A Former User]

@Senk-Ju So Does that mean it will no longer Work with 32 bit ?
And Is it going to be a Version I mean like no need for forge Or Is it going to be Forge ?
And yea tbh I want it to work With forge

[A Former User]

@LoveDucks And Please Let LB work with 32bit and Thank you

[benja]

I'm still wondering about the people who don't have 64bit-systems yet. What hardware you using?

[A Former User]

@benja I don't talk to you ):(

[Temm]

@LoveDucks Literally scroll up. Someone has already asked this and it has already been answered. There is no reason why Liquidbounce wouldnt work on 32 bit anymore.

[LolMC]

who's right?

[scorpion3013]

@LolMC said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:

who's right?

Both.
What SenkJu mentions might be implemented on top. But its not related to the current crossversion support.

[Gabriel]

@Senk-Ju it is, i checked myself it has a viaversion folder on sigma5 config folder.

[A Former User]

This post is deleted!

[Temm]

@commandblock2 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:

Well world downloader is not quite necessary, I have tried a separate program(A reverse proxy or sth like that) recently. It supports 1.12+ https://github.com/mircokroon/minecraft-world-downloader.

Alright, i tested that proxy over the past few days now. It seemed like a great concept, but sadly it isn't really stable. After letting it run for many hours, the connection lags so hard that you basically cant play when connecting through the proxy. After restarting the proxy, it also didn't show many of the previously loaded chunks as already loaded (via the white grid)

[Azure]

[A Former User]

I suggest u support 1.7 swing animation in 1.9+
(It's better to support it like sigma5)

[籽岷]

@1689295608 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:

I think liquidbounce also needs some functions similar to sigma, because Sigma is still very powerful, including Direct conversion version, infinitaura, etc., and liquidbounce is very open, so I hope liquidbounce will surpass sigma sooner or later! [translation from: Baidu translation. I can't help it if it's not accurate. I dare not send Chinese]

我敢(小声比比)

[ChocoPie_isme]

@籽岷 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:

@1689295608 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:

I think liquidbounce also needs some functions similar to sigma, because Sigma is still very powerful, including Direct conversion version, infinitaura, etc., and liquidbounce is very open, so I hope liquidbounce will surpass sigma sooner or later! [translation from: Baidu translation. I can't help it if it's not accurate. I dare not send Chinese]

我敢(小声比比)

sigma is shit, from bypasses to performances

[A Former User]

better killaura and better fly und all modules better blease, and please do not get kicked because of packages so quickly.

[A Former User]

This post is deleted!

[superblaubeere27]

@marcos10pc If your PC has a mental crisis, it is ok

[mems]

@Lennox-kabis It's been said many times even from developers I guess, bypassing is NOT EASY. I hope you understand that.