CrossVersion-Support is coming
-
I think liquidbounce also needs some functions similar to sigma, because Sigma is still very powerful, including Direct conversion version, infinitaura, etc., and liquidbounce is very open, so I hope liquidbounce will surpass sigma sooner or later!
[translation from: Baidu translation.I can't help it if it's not accurate. I dare not send Chinese] -
@1689295608 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:
including Direct conversion version
Please explain. Do you mean switching version by clicking a button in the multiplayer menu, without having to restart the game? If that is what you mean, this is not how we plan to do crossversion support. We plan to do it like Wurst, which has a separate jar file for every version, but the actual cheat code is almost the same between versions by creating our own Abstraction Layer, which makes the client easier to update.
-
@Senk-Ju So Does that mean it will no longer Work with 32 bit ?
And Is it going to be a Version I mean like no need for forge Or Is it going to be Forge ?
And yea tbh I want it to work With forge -
@LoveDucks And Please Let LB work with 32bit and Thank you
-
@LolMC said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:
who's right?Both.
What SenkJu mentions might be implemented on top. But its not related to the current crossversion support. -
This post is deleted!
-
@commandblock2 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:
Well world downloader is not quite necessary, I have tried a separate program(A reverse proxy or sth like that) recently. It supports 1.12+ https://github.com/mircokroon/minecraft-world-downloader.
Alright, i tested that proxy over the past few days now. It seemed like a great concept, but sadly it isn't really stable. After letting it run for many hours, the connection lags so hard that you basically cant play when connecting through the proxy. After restarting the proxy, it also didn't show many of the previously loaded chunks as already loaded (via the white grid)
-
I suggest u support 1.7 swing animation in 1.9+
(It's better to support it like sigma5) -
@1689295608 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:
I think liquidbounce also needs some functions similar to sigma, because Sigma is still very powerful, including Direct conversion version, infinitaura, etc., and liquidbounce is very open, so I hope liquidbounce will surpass sigma sooner or later!
[translation from: Baidu translation.I can't help it if it's not accurate. I dare not send Chinese]我敢(小声比比)
-
@籽岷 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:
@1689295608 said in CrossVersion-Support is coming:
I think liquidbounce also needs some functions similar to sigma, because Sigma is still very powerful, including Direct conversion version, infinitaura, etc., and liquidbounce is very open, so I hope liquidbounce will surpass sigma sooner or later!
[translation from: Baidu translation.I can't help it if it's not accurate. I dare not send Chinese]我敢(小声比比)
sigma is shit, from bypasses to performances
-
better killaura and better fly und all modules better blease, and please do not get kicked because of packages so quickly.