关于官方删除api v1 的看法(Opinions on the official removal of API v1)
-
说实话，这真的是一件好事，因为旧版本的api虽然写起来便捷但是真的bug太多太多，新版本能规避掉很多问题
但是也有一些遗留，比如说大多数人还停留在对脚本是api v1的社区，比如说旧版js没人维护怎么办，虽然我一直在搞相关的东西，但是数量太多，社区的好兄弟们写js又是随心所欲，真的不太好移植，再比如说官方提出的新版api的示例太简单以及过时To be honest, this is really a good thing because although the old version of the API was easy to write, there were too many bugs, and the new version instinctively avoided many problems
But there are also some legacies, such as most people still staying in the community where the script is API v1. For example, what if the old version of JS is not maintained by anyone? Although I have been working on related things, there are too many, and the community's good friends write JS at will, which is really not easy to transplant. For example, the official example of the new version of the API is too simple and outdated -
说实话，这真的是一件好事，因为旧版本的api虽然写起来便捷但是真的bug太多太多，新版本能规避掉很多问题
但是也有一些遗留，比如说大多数人还停留在对脚本是api v1的社区，比如说旧版js没人维护怎么办，虽然我一直在搞相关的东西，但是数量太多，社区的好兄弟们写js又是随心所欲，真的不太好移植，再比如说官方提出的新版api的示例太简单以及过时To be honest, this is really a good thing because although the old version of the API was easy to write, there were too many bugs, and the new version instinctively avoided many problems
But there are also some legacies, such as most people still staying in the community where the script is API v1. For example, what if the old version of JS is not maintained by anyone? Although I have been working on related things, there are too many, and the community's good friends write JS at will, which is really not easy to transplant. For example, the official example of the new version of the API is too simple and outdated@ybyyby_-awa I could probably work on a proper example script.
