[REQ] AutoTranslate script and NoKillAuraInHub and NoChestStealer/InventoryCleanerInHub script

[caex]

@cancernameu gonna have to /uj on this one since you dont know causation /= correlation

[A Former User]

@caex You're misrepresenting my point. I'm not talking about video games, I'm talking about beliefs. Is a nazi on the internet not likely a nazi in real life?

[caex]

@co丶dynamic thanks b hope you saw the msg
@cancernameu not a misinterpretation
read my previous message

[A Former User]

@caex This has nothing to do with causation. My point is, someone who holds nazi beliefs on the internet also likely holds them in real life. Am I wrong?

[caex]

@cancernameu likely? Yes.
unlikely? Yes.
there. theres your answer. now please show me your amazing internet justice skills

[A Former User]

@caex "likely" and "unlikely" are mutually exclusive.

[caex]

@cancernameu correlation /= causation

[A Former User]

@caex Wow, you're actually an idiot. I know that correlation is not causation and vice versa, I never said or even implied that there is causation between believing in nazi stuff on the internet and believing nazi stuff in real life, I can't measure that. However, what I do know, and what you have implied with your constant misrepresentation of my point, that there is a correlation between those things.

[caex]

@cancernameu sorry could you repeat that? maybe repeat a few times. i doubt you get why you're wrong though.
edit: this is getting way off topic so this is my last post--
you assume people are serious on the internet

[A Former User]

@caex Well, if you believe I am wrong about there being a correlation between holding nazi beliefs on the internet and holding those same beliefs in real life, go ahead and argue that.

[caex]

@cancernameu this was what i was talking about the whole time
now please cope harder

[A Former User]

@caex ...then make an argument?

[caex]

@cancernameu there is a correlation for a and a correlation for not a, both with virtually same chances
therefore they're both retarded and should not be considered valid correlation as it is completely random

[A Former User]

@caex "there is a correlation for a and a correlation for not a" -- I'm sorry, what? What correlates with a, what even is a? Please rephrase that.

[HabitualDeep]

wtf has this become lmaoo

[mems]

@gc-onetap poor guy

asked for help, but now there are others who need help lol

[HabitualDeep]

@mems lmao yeah

[halal.club]

This post is deleted!