Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

LiquidBounce Forum

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Why forks don't merge their changes with legacy liquidbounce and dont helping in developement?

Why forks don't merge their changes with legacy liquidbounce and dont helping in developement?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved General Discussion
custombuildliquidbouncebypasscodemerging changes
24 Posts 7 Posters 7.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cxtspnzwzdC cxtspnzwzd

    @CzechHek I understand for now reason for merging. But why they don't help or work in developement.

    CzechHekC Offline
    CzechHekC Offline
    CzechHek
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @cxtspnzwzd It's not that easy to add something into original LB because of its required coding standards, major changes wouldn't also get approved because there isn't any active development on the legacy branch. Many pull request take long to accept or jut get rejected.

    kawaiinekololisK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CzechHekC CzechHek

      @cxtspnzwzd It's not that easy to add something into original LB because of its required coding standards, major changes wouldn't also get approved because there isn't any active development on the legacy branch. Many pull request take long to accept or jut get rejected.

      kawaiinekololisK Offline
      kawaiinekololisK Offline
      kawaiinekololis
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      I have no idea. People seem to not like the idea of commiting their bypasses to LiquidBounce itself.

      kawaiinekololisK 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • kawaiinekololisK kawaiinekololis

        I have no idea. People seem to not like the idea of commiting their bypasses to LiquidBounce itself.

        kawaiinekololisK Offline
        kawaiinekololisK Offline
        kawaiinekololis
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        When it comes to Legacy, I am very open to not taking coding standards that seriously. I would be very happy if people would commit their bypasses to Legacy or even Nextgen. I also wrote a post about this some time ago: https://forums.ccbluex.net/topic/7570/do-not-be-afraid-to-contribute

        kawaiinekololisK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • kawaiinekololisK kawaiinekololis

          When it comes to Legacy, I am very open to not taking coding standards that seriously. I would be very happy if people would commit their bypasses to Legacy or even Nextgen. I also wrote a post about this some time ago: https://forums.ccbluex.net/topic/7570/do-not-be-afraid-to-contribute

          kawaiinekololisK Offline
          kawaiinekololisK Offline
          kawaiinekololis
          Admin
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          Especially when I see people actively contributing to forks or other clients, I wonder what we did wrong.

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kawaiinekololisK kawaiinekololis

            Especially when I see people actively contributing to forks or other clients, I wonder what we did wrong.

            G Offline
            G Offline
            Gabriel
            wrote on last edited by Gabriel
            #8

            @kawaiinekololis I think that LB forks are becoming more known than LiquidBounce itself due to a snowball effect, being:

            • Minecraft Cheating dying in general
            • People making a ton of videos about LiquidBounce forks
            • People starting to forget about LiquidBounce itself
            • Some unique fork bypasses not being added to LiquidBounce, due to some people knowing what LiquidBounce+ Reborn is, but not knowing what LiquidBounce is, therefore not being able to contribute
            • Because of people not being able to contribute because they don't even know LiquidBounce exists, the remaining people switch to forks because they have more bypasses

            Only a few people such as @CzechHek, @mems, and I, are actually contributing to LiquidBounce, and making it better; but remember, YOU, dear viewer of this post, can make a difference, you just have to learn a tiny bit of coding, and step by step, you'll be way better off.

            R cxtspnzwzdC 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • G Gabriel

              @kawaiinekololis I think that LB forks are becoming more known than LiquidBounce itself due to a snowball effect, being:

              • Minecraft Cheating dying in general
              • People making a ton of videos about LiquidBounce forks
              • People starting to forget about LiquidBounce itself
              • Some unique fork bypasses not being added to LiquidBounce, due to some people knowing what LiquidBounce+ Reborn is, but not knowing what LiquidBounce is, therefore not being able to contribute
              • Because of people not being able to contribute because they don't even know LiquidBounce exists, the remaining people switch to forks because they have more bypasses

              Only a few people such as @CzechHek, @mems, and I, are actually contributing to LiquidBounce, and making it better; but remember, YOU, dear viewer of this post, can make a difference, you just have to learn a tiny bit of coding, and step by step, you'll be way better off.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Razzy
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @Gabriel I tend to agree with the snowball effect. The problem is that Liquidbounce doesn't have any built in bypasses they all have to be made yourself. This became worse with when scripts started to die off. To bring some new players back the Legacy UI needs to be redone it's looking hella dated at this point and is really a turn off compared to some of the forks. I'd be happy to help but I can't code so and Gpt4 still isn't at a usable state.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Razzy

                @Gabriel I tend to agree with the snowball effect. The problem is that Liquidbounce doesn't have any built in bypasses they all have to be made yourself. This became worse with when scripts started to die off. To bring some new players back the Legacy UI needs to be redone it's looking hella dated at this point and is really a turn off compared to some of the forks. I'd be happy to help but I can't code so and Gpt4 still isn't at a usable state.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Gabriel
                wrote on last edited by Gabriel
                #10

                @Razzy LiquidBounce actually doesn't look dated; if you look at FDPClient, it's in a much worse state, + LiquidBounce+ Reborn has a ton of issues, including 1k+ errors a minute (literally), and nearly reducing the FPS to zero. Oh, and also; you can still make configs, that can help even more, due to the already existing potential in LiquidBounce.

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Gabriel

                  @Razzy LiquidBounce actually doesn't look dated; if you look at FDPClient, it's in a much worse state, + LiquidBounce+ Reborn has a ton of issues, including 1k+ errors a minute (literally), and nearly reducing the FPS to zero. Oh, and also; you can still make configs, that can help even more, due to the already existing potential in LiquidBounce.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Razzy
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @Gabriel Yeah, the UI doesn't look dated but it doesn't look "modern" to say the least.
                  Also on the config side there's just a few things missing which would be a great help, for example Vulcan speed which could be easily taken from LB+R or fdp. I also have no alts to use anymore to make configs and with thealtening being dead and easymc support being removed there's not much I can do.

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Razzy

                    @Gabriel Yeah, the UI doesn't look dated but it doesn't look "modern" to say the least.
                    Also on the config side there's just a few things missing which would be a great help, for example Vulcan speed which could be easily taken from LB+R or fdp. I also have no alts to use anymore to make configs and with thealtening being dead and easymc support being removed there's not much I can do.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Gabriel
                    wrote on last edited by Gabriel
                    #12

                    @Razzy Here's the thing, we don't want to skid any code, so we would probably need to make our own Vulcan speed…

                    CzechHekC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Gabriel

                      @Razzy Here's the thing, we don't want to skid any code, so we would probably need to make our own Vulcan speed…

                      CzechHekC Offline
                      CzechHekC Offline
                      CzechHek
                      wrote on last edited by CzechHek
                      #13

                      @Gabriel Should taking code from forks of your GNU v3 repo be considered as skidding tho?

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CzechHekC CzechHek

                        @Gabriel Should taking code from forks of your GNU v3 repo be considered as skidding tho?

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Gabriel
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @CzechHek Well, it's indirectly skidding, since all of those bypasses ARE skidded, so…

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Gabriel

                          @kawaiinekololis I think that LB forks are becoming more known than LiquidBounce itself due to a snowball effect, being:

                          • Minecraft Cheating dying in general
                          • People making a ton of videos about LiquidBounce forks
                          • People starting to forget about LiquidBounce itself
                          • Some unique fork bypasses not being added to LiquidBounce, due to some people knowing what LiquidBounce+ Reborn is, but not knowing what LiquidBounce is, therefore not being able to contribute
                          • Because of people not being able to contribute because they don't even know LiquidBounce exists, the remaining people switch to forks because they have more bypasses

                          Only a few people such as @CzechHek, @mems, and I, are actually contributing to LiquidBounce, and making it better; but remember, YOU, dear viewer of this post, can make a difference, you just have to learn a tiny bit of coding, and step by step, you'll be way better off.

                          cxtspnzwzdC Offline
                          cxtspnzwzdC Offline
                          cxtspnzwzd
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @Gabriel I am agree with snowball effect. In addition I can say I caught myself on what I am more interesting for any project fork, instead original project. Maybe it is one of reason, why forks 'more active' than original liquidbounce.

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cxtspnzwzdC cxtspnzwzd

                            @Gabriel I am agree with snowball effect. In addition I can say I caught myself on what I am more interesting for any project fork, instead original project. Maybe it is one of reason, why forks 'more active' than original liquidbounce.

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gabriel
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            @cxtspnzwzd People also think that LiquidBounce is discontinued, which is totally false.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              A Former User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              I don't expect people not to think that the client is discontinued when b73 took almost 2 years to release because of a severe screw-up. With that being said there are some who don't even know that b73 got updated, they probably don't even know the client's version is 10 numbers ahead lol

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • cxtspnzwzdC cxtspnzwzd marked this topic as a question on
                              • CzechHekC Offline
                                CzechHekC Offline
                                CzechHek
                                wrote on last edited by CzechHek
                                #18

                                After all those recently rejected pull requests with "skidded" code, I came to the conclusion that this is the main cause of inactivity when compared with other forks.

                                Perhaps such code should be tolerated, if it gets modified to work within LB or even if it works better than original?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  A Former User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  I would happily merge any pull request under these rules:

                                  A person actually came up with this bypass
                                  The code is ORIGINALLY from a LiquidBounce fork and then it may have been used by paid clients / clients that don't share the same license as LiquidBounce.

                                  And as we speak, this lad uploaded a new pull request:

                                  https://github.com/CCBlueX/LiquidBounce/pull/1339/files

                                  How can I now know if this is really not stolen and he actually came up with this? Secondly and no disrespect towards him, but it has been repeatedly shown he doesn't really know how to code or have some sort of idea how to put something in a module and make it work. By the bad indentation I can tell he simply pasted the code from some client that as of now I don't know if it's from a LiquidBounce fork.

                                  NCPUser opened this pull request in CCBlueX/LiquidBounce

                                  closed added new crit mode. #1339

                                  R G 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ? A Former User

                                    I would happily merge any pull request under these rules:

                                    A person actually came up with this bypass
                                    The code is ORIGINALLY from a LiquidBounce fork and then it may have been used by paid clients / clients that don't share the same license as LiquidBounce.

                                    And as we speak, this lad uploaded a new pull request:

                                    https://github.com/CCBlueX/LiquidBounce/pull/1339/files

                                    How can I now know if this is really not stolen and he actually came up with this? Secondly and no disrespect towards him, but it has been repeatedly shown he doesn't really know how to code or have some sort of idea how to put something in a module and make it work. By the bad indentation I can tell he simply pasted the code from some client that as of now I don't know if it's from a LiquidBounce fork.

                                    NCPUser opened this pull request in CCBlueX/LiquidBounce

                                    closed added new crit mode. #1339

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Razzy
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @mems How would you feel about me trying to merge something like this?
                                    https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1JL411C7dh/?spm_id_from=333.788.recommend_more_video.0
                                    (I'm not Chinese It's just the only video if it I could find.)

                                    It's from KevinClient Reborn and im 99% sure no other client has this that I've found so far. Pretty sure I could make some improvements to it aswell due to the glide aspect of it being pretty inefficient.

                                    Plumer ManP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      A Former User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      Just make sure it's under the second rule I stated:

                                      The code is ORIGINALLY from a LiquidBounce fork and then it may have been used by paid clients / clients that don't share the same license as LiquidBounce.

                                      If the guy who made it stole it from a non-LiquidBounce fork, then sorry but no. If not, then feel free to make one.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Razzy

                                        @mems How would you feel about me trying to merge something like this?
                                        https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1JL411C7dh/?spm_id_from=333.788.recommend_more_video.0
                                        (I'm not Chinese It's just the only video if it I could find.)

                                        It's from KevinClient Reborn and im 99% sure no other client has this that I've found so far. Pretty sure I could make some improvements to it aswell due to the glide aspect of it being pretty inefficient.

                                        Plumer ManP Offline
                                        Plumer ManP Offline
                                        Plumer Man
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        real most hardest to find bypass

                                        mc.thePlayer.motionY = mc.thePlayer.ticksExisted % 2 == 0 ? -0.2 : -0.1;
                                        
                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Plumer ManP Plumer Man

                                          real most hardest to find bypass

                                          mc.thePlayer.motionY = mc.thePlayer.ticksExisted % 2 == 0 ? -0.2 : -0.1;
                                          
                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Razzy
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @Plumer-Man yeah, i made a script out of it to try and it was terrible

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          About
                                          • Terms of Service
                                          • Privacy Policy
                                          • Status
                                          • Contact Us
                                          Downloads
                                          • Releases
                                          • Source code
                                          • License
                                          Docs
                                          • Tutorials
                                          • CustomHUD
                                          • AutoSettings
                                          • ScriptAPI
                                          Community
                                          • Forum
                                          • Guilded
                                          • YouTube
                                          • Twitter
                                          • D.Tube
                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups